BB1425
: The
Crinkle Test
Thursday
17th July 2014
I
was looking back to our visits to the Crinkles, BB0726, BB0931 and BB1029.
When I read about our first visit, I fell about laughing.
It records that on a steep descent Bryan observed
that it was the sort of terrain where it would be helpful
to have two poles.
One
to carry your bag and one to pour a drink for you!!
Politically
incorrect perhaps but it still makes me chuckle.
Another
notable feature of that visit was that it was the first
time that we had had to use a GPS to check where we
were on the summits, having discovered in the mist a
tarn that shouldn't have been there!
Today
was another GPS significant outing but not quite what
I had expected. I anticipated there would be a battle
as Martin, Mike and I have each bought a new (or to
be precise, an ex-demo) Garmin GSMAP62s
whilst Bryan has bought a brand new Garmin Etrex30.
However, to my surprise he had not brought it with
him and was using his trusty old Etrex 10- a simple
old model without mapping- just like the one I lost
on BB1422
.
In
consequence
we were unable to resolve which was better buy and I
can only do a field test report on the one model. Readers
whose eyes are about to glaze over can relax. That
(mostly) comes later.
Crinkle
Crags
Given
the history, it seemed appropriate that the test ground
was again to be the Crinkles, especially as this was
the only Wainwright left for John within easy striking
distance of home.
Clouded
Crinkles across the meadow
The
forecast suggested it would be in rather better weather
than 7 years ago. Unfortunately, the weather gods hadn't
listened to the forecasters and what was supposed to
be a morning of rapidly clearing mist proved to be intermittently
overcast with mist patches until after lunch and in
particular until after summiting the Crinkles. Once
again, the GPS would prove helpful.
Morning
view of the Crinkles
|
Tony
leads the charge
|
We
approached from the Old Dungeon Gill Hotel, up Oxendale.
At one point when some way ahead of the rest Stan
and I spotted a couple in front of us. What happened
can only be described as telepathic. All of a
sudden I knew that Stan was going to change gear and
charge up the hill to overtake them. At exactly
the same moment Stan experienced the same thought about
me. In consequence, without a word being said
and in perfect harmony, we accelerated together, our
strides in total unison.. A fine display of synchronised
BOOTboying
that quickly left the victims far in our wake! Silly
old men!
After
the group was reunited we turned south almost to Red Tarn then picked
up the Crinkles motorway. To be fair, the newly
laid stone path was not a problem on the ascent. Crinkle
1 presented no difficulties but there were mixed feelings
about the Bad Step route up Crinkle 2. Some went
up the step and some went round.
Approaching
Crinkle 2
|
At
the Bad Step
|
We regrouped
for lunch at the summit.
Comitibus
: Crinkle
Crags
Tony
checks the view both ways
Cloud
on the Scafells
|
Way
to go!
Langdale
in the sun
John
bags his Wainwright
|
On
restarting, the Garmin map ensured we didn't make the
BB0726 Long
Top mistake. In now rapidly improving weather,
Crinkles 3, 4 and 5 succumbed in quick succession. albeit
with some tricky negotiation of the rocky terrain..
There was a fine view of Bowfell with Scafell
and Scafell Pike behind.
Bowfell
with Scafell and Scafell Pike behind
To
descend via The Band or by Hell Gill?
Bryan and
Stan were adamant that latter would prove the easier
and quicker
route and as we all followed there is no gainsaying
Hell
Gill with Pike o'Blisco behind
|
Lower
Hell Gill with Crinkles behind
|
The fixed path down proved a lot more awkward
and tiring than had the one up. Now rather behind
schedule. we returned to the cars and the ODG.
Horse
and Donkey, Side Pike behind
|
Stool
End Farm
|
I was delighted to note that we had completed an
impressive 25.5 miles as opposed to the predicted
8.
They are rather good, these new GPSs!
Don,
Thursday 17 July 2014
PS
See the review below for the explanation of the unexpected
mileages- the Garmins were not at fault. We were!
The
No-Colour Supplement
Click
on photo to restore colour
GPS
Test: Garmin Etrex 30 versus Garmin GSMAP62s, Part 1.
The
new Garmin Etrex30
and the ex-demo Garmin GSMAP62s
were both purchased by mail order from Shepherds
Walks in Rothbury,
Northumberland who were very helpful in dealing with
our questions regarding the relative merits of the units..
We
had already ruled out the SatMap alternative. They
are expensive and I find them too big for my hands.
I
have not tried the SatMap logic but I don't find setting
up the Garmin to be very intuitive. I think the problem
is that they are designed to cater for so many different
types of activity rather than being a dedicated walker's
unit. Of course, once I am used to the device, such
problems will hopefully vanish.
The
dearer Garmins did not seem to offer any additional
features that we wanted, compared to the 62s or Etrex30.
|
Etrex
30
|
GSMAP62s
|
Normally
the Etrex30 would have been the cheaper
but the 62s is a discontinued model and we were offered
sales reps' demonstrators, pre-loaded with maps, at
a substantial discount from list price. On arrival,
they proved to be in pristine condition.
The
first obvious difference between the models is size
and weight. At 6.3 inches, the 62s is about 50%
longer and at 260gm is 80% heavier than the Etrex30.
What do you get for that extra bulk? Hopefully
greater robustness and extra satellite sensitivity.
Screen
size is pretty similar (62s a wee bit bigger) but, to
my surprise, the Etrex 30 has slightly more dots per
inch so in theory should give marginally better definition.
Neither is touch screen. Mandatory. Who
wants to take their gloves off to work the gps in freezing
temperatures? I don't understand why they put them on.
Touchscreens, I mean, not gloves!
The
62s provides the opportunity to have more stats on the
screen at the same time, useful but not a major benefit.
|
Both
came equipped with the OS 1:50k maps installed- these
were an extra cost for the Etrex30 but were included
for the 62s deal.. You
can get 1:25k OS maps loaded at a price but as the screen
is so small, I prefer to have an A4 print-out of the
larger scale map in a waterproof cover. The screen
basically provides confirmation that you are where you
think you are and are heading in the right direction.
Hopefully.
The
62s has now been replaced by the GPSMAP64s.
I thought I read somewhere that the new model
had a much clearer screen thanks to a doubling of pixel
density but not so according to the Garmin website.
On paper the Etrex30 seemed the better
choice for our
purposes until you take price into consideration.
How
do they compare in action? Today I can only comment
on the 62s.
I
zeroed the registers before setting off from home and
switched on the device just before we started walking.
When we reached Oxendale Beck I thought I would
see how far we had come, probably, I thought, a little more than
a mile. I was shocked to see that the register
said 19.3.
Martin
checked his and his said 15.8. How could they
both be so far out?
We concluded that the problem
was that the machines were far more sensitive than we
expected and they had actually determined their location
whilst inside our respective houses. Although
they were then switched off, when turned back on
they thought it was a continuation of the previous "trip"
and that we had flown a direct line.
The
lesson is to zero the registers immediately before
you are about
to set off on the actual walk.
The
"flight" has now been deleted from the track
log for this report but another problem has come to light. Either
the footbridge across Oxendale Beck is wrongly marked
on the map or the GPS went walkabout at that point.
On
the top of Crinkle Crag it is very easy to set off in
the wrong direction, as we did in the mist on BB0726.
Using the GPS with the 1:50k map on screen ensured
that we didn't make that mistake. Others, we think,
did!
We
had a discussion as to whether it was better to use
it set for "North Up" or Track Up". In
other words so the screen shows the map in a fixed position
with north at the top whilst the location cursor arrow
head shows which way you're travelling or so the screen
rotates the map according to the direction in which
you are travelling. Bryan is a big Track Up fan.
I am more undecided, particularly as the text
disconcertingly swings round with the map as you turn
(as it would on paper) rather than remaining heads up
as in a car gps. When navigating from a paper map in
a car, I always work with the map North Up and think
of East and West as rotations not directions.. As usual
on the mountains, I think Bryan is probably right. I
wish the location cursor were somewhat smaller, however.
It
remains to be seen how the two models will compare in
a head to head test. Jon at Shepherds Walks reckons
the 62s to be a far superior unit, having a better screen
and interface. I suspect that it also is more
sensitive to satellites (it must be clever to locate me indoors!).
My
conclusion is that the decision to go for
one or other of these models of these was right for
me compared with the dearer (or indeed the cheaper)
Garmins or SatMaps
Not
having yet field tested the Etrex 30, these comments
are only provisional but If
you are paying list price or thereabouts, then unless
you must have lots of stats on the screen at the same
time or need a rather more robust or sensitive unit,
I suspect the Etrex30 is the one to go for as it is
cheaper, lighter and offers mostly the same functionality.
Indeed,
had I not kept reminding myself that my Garmin was ex-demo
(albeit in perfect condition) and, with maps included,
was some
£100 cheaper than the Etrex package, I think I
might have found myself regretting my decision
However,at
the price I paid for the 62s, I am happy to carry the
extra weight- not just of the device but also the pocket
full of money saved!
Don,
Thursday 17th July 2014
PS
I am not impressed with the Garmin Base Camp mapping
software when compared with Memory Map.
Bryan's
Dream
Just
what has Bryan, pictured here in silhouette,
been smoking to produce such an hallucinogenic
vision?
And
where is the dream taking place?
He
tells me that it is to do with Great End,
Scafell Pike, Great Gable and Brandreth.
To
find out more of his recent non-hallucinogenic
exploits, see Bryan's
dream.
|
|
STATISTICS:
|
BB1425
|
Date:
|
Thursday
17th July 2014
|
Distance
in miles
|
8.5
|
Height
climbed in feet
|
2,816
|
Features:
|
Crinkle
Crags
|
Comitibus:
|
Bryan, Don, John Hn, Martin C, Mike,
Stan, Tony
|
BOOTboys
routes are put online in gpx format which
should work with most mapping software. On this occasion
however I have a processing problem!
To
discover which Wainwright top was visited on which BB outing
- although it may not be that up to date - see: Which
Wainwright When?
For the latest totals of the mileages and heights (ditto) see: BB Log.
Photos
have been gleaned from many sources although mostly
from me! Likewise written comment. Unless stated
otherwise, please feel free to download the material
if you wish. A reference back to this website
would be appreciated. If I have
failed to acknowledge properly the source or infringed
copyright, then I apologise. . Please let me
know and I will do my best to put things right.
E-mail addresses on this web site are protected
by
Spam Trawlers will be further frustrated
by Spam Blocker:
help fight spam e-mail!.
|